German Tank Destroyer Ww2

German Tank Destroyer Ww2 - The answer is yes, no, then yes. The muzzle brake is designed to increase the life of the gun by directing some of the explosive force of the shell gases to the side instead of just forward.

The wooden mockup of the model had a muzzle brake. Early production Jagdpanzer 38 tank destroyers had muzzle brakes but these were removed by the crew and later production vehicles were not fitted. It turned out that they gave off a lot of dust and smoke, which gave them a chance to ambush.

German Tank Destroyer Ww2

How Effective Were Tank Destroyers In Ww2? - YoutubeSource:

This was often bad. The post-war version of the Swiss G13 had a muzzle brake installed. The rear spaced case was protected by a single piece of 200 mm front armor plate set at an angle of 20°.

Did The Jagdpanzer Have A Muzzle Brake?

The sides were 80 mm thick and placed at an angle of 30 °. The rear armor was the same thickness of armor set at an angle of 20 °. The top was lighter, by 30 mm placed at an angle of 86 °.

As for armor piercing (AP) rounds, there were better options, with a few different types available. These included the standard Pzgr.39-1 and the improved Pzgr.39/43 AP, which had a range of 4 km. Pzgr. Patr 40 was a tungsten-based armor-piercing shell with a uniform range of 4 km. Finally, Gr.Patr 39 H1 and Gr.Patr 39/43 H1 charge rounds were found, which had a range of about 3 km. When Marder

had enough firepower to destroy any enemy tank in 1942/43, the Soviet war was too much for the Lorraine 37L chassis. This can be seen in the combat report issued by Pz.Jg.Abt 72 (under the 72nd Infantry Division), which states: 'as experience has shown, these (Marder I) are of little combat value due to their limited ability to

to be employed. for the weather'. In another report issued by Pz.Jg.Abt 256, it is stated that: 'except Marder I, weapons and other vehicles have proven to be useful'. Due to bad weather, low numbers, spare parts and other problems, not many Marder Is would be used on the Eastern Front and they would be replaced by Marder II and III vehicles which were built on a more reliable chassis.

The Armament

The sides of the compartment had two armor plates. The smaller one, towards the front, was slightly angled towards the front plate. The large side armor had narrow rectangular blades for the staff on both sides to the rear.

On the left side, towards the back, the base of the cubic mount of the antenna was placed. The main gun was described as having good stability when firing and was able to penetrate the T-34's hull and turret weapons without difficulty.

There were cases of penetrating the side armor of the T-34 at a distance of 1200 meters, as well as another case of destroying an American-issued Lee tank at the same range. Modern Age: Are tanks still relevant?: Despite many prophets declaring the death of the tank, artillery is still an important branch of all world militaries.

There are no signs of this changing anytime soon, with tank development continuing to adapt to the modern battlefield. The construction of such a car was given to the Nibelungenwerk. The first prototype was completed in April 1942 and presented to Hitler on his birthday, April 20. Hitler was impressed because Dr.

German Post-Combat Analysis

Porsche received an order for the production of 90 cars (including 10 with a hydraulic car) in May 1942. The second prototype, which was recently built, was transported to the military weapons test site in Kummersdorf in June 1942. In VK45.01(

P ) specifically proved a new engine that could be damaged. (function (d, s, n) { var js, fjs = d.getElementsByTagName[0]; js = d.createElement(s); js.className = n; js.src = "//player.ex .co/ player/710cf52d-720a-4250-8e95-fc85dcedab01"; fjs.parentNode.insertBefore(js, fjs); }(script, 'script', 'exco-player'));

Marder Iii – Sdkfz 139 – Wwii German Tank Destroyer | Brickmania BlogSource:

The main gun chosen for the Marder II was the old modified 7.62 cm PaK 36 (r) anti-tank gun. This gun, with its modified 'T' mount, was mounted directly above the engine room. The height of the main gun was -5 ° to +16 ° and passed 25 ° to the left and right.

The total ammunition load was only 30 rounds, placed in the ammunition barrels located just below the gun, inside the Marder II. To reduce the load on the height and clearance lines during long trips, two travel locks were added, one in the front and one in the back.

Czechoslovakian St-

In 1939, the German army was interested in the development of the flamethrower Panzer to be used as an anti-bunker weapon. As the Panzer II Ausf.D and E were rejected from service, their chassis were selected for this modification.

The vehicle produced was designated the Panzer II Flamm Ausf.A und B, although today it is known as the 'Flamingo'. By March 1942, about 150 had been produced, but their performance was considered poor due to weak weapons and poor performance of the fire projector system.

When these Panzer IIs returned from the front line and because of the great demand for mobile anti-tank vehicles, the Germans used the chassis once again for this new role. In early April 1942, all Panzer II fire chassis would be used again for this purpose.

Due to further fighting, the number of vehicles was reduced to four, with one being repaired on 8 June 1942. Due to further losses, only one vehicle was operational and two were inoperative at the beginning of July.

The Vehicle’s Designation

That same month, at least two vehicles participated in the Axis conquest of Tobruk. In the failed attempt to break the line at El Alamein, one more was lost. At the beginning of December 1942, the last remaining 7.62 cm F.K.(r) auf gp.

Selbstfahrlafette Sd.Kfz.6/3 was eventually lost. Of the 9 cars built, at least one was captured by the British in North Africa. The 167th Infantry Division had 9 Marder I vehicles until the end of January 1943. When it was sent to the Eastern Front at the end of February 1943, all Marder Is were replaced with 9 7.5 cm PaK 40 anti-tank guns.

Infants have proved to be a problem. Infantry commanders often call on the Marder II to engage enemy tanks in critical situations, for example if enemy tanks are dug in or on the ground. The Marder II was not an infantry support vehicle like the StuG III and therefore should not have been used in this type of combat.

The fighting in the Ardennes convinced the army of the need to retool its tank destroyers in favor of self-propelled systems like the M18. Although in 1945 the preference was to re-equip units with the newer M36, which had a 90mm gun capable of destroying the Panther at longer ranges than the M18's 76mm gun.

Eastern Front

Despite the preference for the M36, the number of units was changed from the M10 to the M18. The decision to build only nine 7.62 cm F.K.(r) auf gp. Selbstfahrlafette Sd.Kfz.6/3 was fully justified, as this vehicle had a number of disadvantages.

Although its gun had good armor-piercing qualities in general, its nature as a field gun made it unsuitable for the anti-tank role. The large overall shape of the vehicle provided an excellent target for enemy attackers.

Battle Of The Bulge | Summary, Commanders, & Significance | BritannicaSource:

The weak, almost useless armor offered no real protection against any form of enemy fire. The low built numbers also reduced his overall performance up front. Finally, when the Germans made a few attempts to develop independent anti-tank vehicles based on half-tracks, these projects ended in failure and were built in small numbers.

Ernest Leppard, 8th Battalion: "I mean, there were eleven of us going over the hill and that's when it took us. We had no answer to them, we couldn't see where they were coming from. Oh, it was a strange tank. In front of the very slippery ice and then the gun was set up and it could

Panzer Iv/V

being only 15 degrees So if we had known they couldn't have bought all of us 11. However there are about seven of our boys killed in the fight and a few. wounded." For the development of such a car, Wa Prüf 6 chose Alkett to build the first prototype.

A mild steel prototype was completed in early February 1941. The conversion included removing the turret and replacing it with an open fighting section equipped with a 4.7 cm anti-tank gun. At the end of March it was presented to Adolf Hitler.

He approved the design and an order for 200 4.7 cm PaK(t) (Sfl.) auf Fgst.Pz.Kpfw.35 R 731, as it was known, was issued, which would be ready by August of that year. The story begins in 1942 when Hitler realized that the German tanks, despite the success so far in the war, were actually not that powerful compared to several tanks they encountered.

They were up against heavy French tanks, and were in danger of losing on the Eastern front to the Soviet T-34s. Some of Zaloga's choices are not surprising. The only tank in the "Battle Champions" that received the Tanker and Commander award is the T-34 in 1941. Despite the two-man turret, its high firepower, armor and mobility shocked the hitherto undefeated German panzers, including

Sim Pak Marder Ee

German infantry. they are afraid to see their anti-tank guns flying off the T-34's thick skin. Some would argue that the Germans destroyed the Soviet tank fleet in 1941 however, but that was the result of poorly trained tank crews, poor maintenance and poor Soviet tactics.

The T-34 was not a champion because it won the war in 1941, but because it kept the Soviets from losing less than they did. One surprise to many is that two early Jagdtigers (covers 1 and 4) were fitted with Porsche Elephant running gear for evaluation purposes after Dr.

Porsche had convinced Hitler of the benefits of suspension in January 1944. With four-wheel drive units made of a pair of 700 mm diameter steel road wheels on each side, the Porsche system offered a production advantage over the running gear of

Henschel. Porsche then promised that it took a third less time to produce than the Henschel system, reduced hull construction time and machining time, required less maintenance, and could actually be completely replaced in the field without removing other parts and without using a jack.

Baptism Of Fire At Kursk

The Jagdtiger's transmission was the same standard gearbox as in the Tiger II, an eight-speed Maybach OLVAR OG40-1216B (manufactured by Adlerwerke of Frankfurt and Zahnradfabrik of Friedrichshafen) mated to a Maybach HL 230 P30 TRM as fitted to the TRM.

II and Panther. This engine was underpowered for a vehicle the size of a Tiger II, let alone the heavier Jagdtiger. One option that was still in the planning stage at the end of the war was to replace the Maybach engine with a 16-cylinder X engine made by Simmering-Pauker.

Oleksandr Fedotov - Marder Or Tank Destroyer.Source:

During its service life, this self-propelled anti-tank gun was known under several different names. When adopted on April 1, 1942, it was designated 7.62 cm PaK 36 (r) auf Fgst. PzKpfw.II(F) (Sfl.). In June 1942 this was changed to Pz.Sfl.1 fuer 7.62 cm PaK 36 (Sd.Kfz.132);

in September 1942 it was again converted to Pz.Sfl.1 (7.62 cm PaK 36) auf Fahrg.Pz.Kpfw.II Ausf.D1 und D2. In September 1943, a simpler name was given: 7.62 cm PaK 36 (r) auf Pz.Kpfw.II. The last change in name was made on March 18, 1944, and the vehicle was then called Panzerjäger II fuer 7.62 cm PaK 36(r) (Sd.Kfz.132).

How Are The Words ‘Baiter And Agitator’ Connected With The Jagdpanzer ?

After Operation Citadel, German after-action reports restored the overall performance of Ferdinand's vehicles. The Ferdinand's most lauded asset was its superior anti-tank capabilities, demonstrated by the large number of claimed destroyed tanks. It had good accuracy, long range and had great armor piercing capability.

The most protected Soviet KV-1 tanks could be destroyed at a distance of 2 km. On average, 2 to 3 rounds were enough to completely destroy enemy tanks. Jagdpanzer 38 Czech Hetzers (several dozen were captured in and around Budapest in 1945) were designated ST-1, for Stihac Tanku or "Tank Hunter".

249 were brought into service. There was also a version of the school driver designated ST-III/CVP (50 cars), the Praga VT-III armored recovery vehicle and the PM-1 flamethrower tank. 50 existing Jagdpanzer 38 tank destroyers were to be modified with a flamethrower turret, but the program was cancelled.

In April 1944 further changes were introduced. The ram's horn towing hooks at the front and rear of the wagon were left behind. They were replaced by extending the side armor plates and drilling a hole in the metal.

First Jagdpanzer Designs

The flange around the gun shroud helped transfer the weight of the gun to the glazier plate of the upper hull. The size of the flange was reduced to reduce the weight of the gun casing.

The height of the roof of the 7.92 mm MG 34 The hinged shield was shortened to prevent it from hitting the top sight of the Sfl.ZF 1a periscope gun. When the Jagdpanzer 38 tank destroyers were destroyed, the maintenance workshop would check which idler wheels were available in their shops.

Sometimes, late version cars would have early version idler wheels with twelve spokes. If only one idler wheel was replaced, then there would be a situation where the car would have different types of idler wheels.

Because it does not have a turret, it has a very small traverse, the gun can only turn 12 degrees in each direction. So if it is attacked from the side or from the back, it is at a very clear advantage because it cannot fight back, which is exactly what happened to this car when it was destroyed.

The Cm Pak Auf Rf Project

So this car has a controversial history. It is claimed that it was extinguished in early September 1944 by the captain of the Welsh Guards Captain Griffiths, who later became a peer of the kingdom Lord Griffiths.

It is alleged that he exceeded the maneuver and put three bullets in the tank and one round in the fuel tank which crippled the car. In 1944, the Panzer 38 (t) tank was considered foreign and obsolete.

Bmc Ww2 German Jagdpanzer Tank Destroyer - Tan Plastic Army Vehicle –  VictorybuySource:

It had been withdrawn from the front line units. The Jagdpanzer 38 used the tried and tested features of the Panzer 38(t) tank on a newer body. This meant that the Jagdpanzer 38 was relatively reliable, as all the early technical problems had been resolved.

This allowed production to start earlier than usual for a new armored vehicle design, as most of the factory tools for the production of the Panzer 38(t) tank were still available. Due to the small aperture of the gun, the driver had to constantly change the direction of the vehicle or move to engage new targets.

Exhaust System

This can indicate the location. Jagdpanzer 38 was not officially called Hetzer during WW2. What follows is an examination of why the nickname Hetzer is associated with this tank fighter. Many German armored vehicles had very long official names, so short nicknames were used to aid identification, for example the Panzerkampfwagen VI Ausf.E was called the Tiger.

There are others, such as Ferdinand, Panther, Grille, Waspe, Hummel and many others. Some of the names were official, others were unofficial and came from the soldiers who use the vehicle. The German Reich even issued an order to change the names of the vehicles because they were considered misleading or inappropriate for a German military vehicle.

Some of the names currently used to describe German World War II tanks came out after the war. Few were inventions of standard model companies. Most of the issued Jagdpanzer IVs were placed on the Eastern Front, in an attempt to halt the Soviet advance.

They saw heavy action there, but they were also used as tanks or assault guns, which the car could not fulfill. Heavy fighting in Poland in October 1944 cost many Germans, including at least 55 Jagdpanzer IVs.

The Engine

The two prototype cars would be fully tested in 1943, focusing on their technical reliability. In the case of the model with chassis number 150011, at the end of August 1943, it was reported that it had driven about 911 km. With a weight of 64.37 tons (without crew and ammunition) it was noted that the fuel consumption was high.

On a good road, crossing 100 kilometers, Ferdinand needed 867.9 liters. Nationwide, this went up to 1,620 liters for the same range. Many defects with the design of the engine, high consumption of oil and fuel, problems with the suspension structure, poor access to maintenance, etc.

This car was originally designated as the Type 130 by Alkett (who was responsible for the development of the prototypes). In the early phase of development, at the end of 1942, a number of different positions were assigned.

One of these was the Sturmgeschütz mit der 8.8 cm in length or the Tiger Sturmgeschütz. At that time, the simple name of Ferdinand (given in honor of Dr. Porsche) was often used by designers and later even by soldiers.

The Armament

By May 1943, Henschel had decided that as a result of design changes the weight was brought to a full 70 tons (the hood alone weighs 43 tons) with 200 mm frontal armor, 80 mm on the sides and rear, and a cabin roof.

now 40 mm thick Drawings of this car will be ready and submitted to Wa Pruef 6 by June 15 with the expectation that the model will be ready in December. Due to some delays, the first 15 cabins were completed in January 1943. The remaining cabins would be ready by mid-April 1943 when they were shipped to the Nibelungenwerke for final assembly.

Krupp was also involved in supplying the necessary spare parts. On February 16, 1943, the construction of the first car began (chassis number 150010). According to the original production plans, the last car should be ready in mid-May 1943.

German Reich Tank Destroyer – - Built